ISIS/ISIL have now claimed
responsibility for three suicide attacks, and Brussels is now on
lockdown due to an 'immediate threat'. First there was the takedown
of a Russian airliner on October 31st, killing over 200 people. The
western world reacted by, well, just getting on with their lives.
Dead Russians aren't that important I guess. Then on the 12th
November, Lebanon suffered the worst attack since the civil war, I
don't even remember seeing that in classical media, and there
certainly isn't a Facebook option to put a Lebanese flag as a profile
picture filter. Then of course, after the co-ordinated attacks on
Paris on the 13th of November, the rest world has been
forced to weather the political storm that has arisen. The victims of
this attack were white after all. Leaders, politicians, the media,
bloggers, and anyone with a Facebook account, all have something to
say on the matter. The discovery of a fake Syrian passport has led to
pertinent questions and theories to arise. Be they valid arguments or
wild conspiracy theories, here is a few of them.
Fake passport dumped
by the ruling class/illuminati/aliens*
*delete
as appropriate
As soon as the news report was released regarding a Syrian passport
being found near one of the suicide bombers, people were cynical. It
gave me a smile when I saw old school friends instantly question the
authenticity of this claim, seeing the holes clearly on first glance.
Whichever dominator you put into the equation (bourgeoisie,
illuminati etc), whichever truth you believe, the theory is the same:
someone placed the passport after the attack in order to use this
information to sway opinion on refugees, tighten borders and increase
both military and security funding. Whether this claim is substantial
or not remains to be seen, but the motive is certainly there. Borders
were instantly closed in France, and the security industry in the UK
was given a huge injection of funds. With all the unanswered
questions surrounding the 9/11 attacks in 2001, I suspect there is
more to this story still to be revealed.
Regarding the immediately available facts, there were two initial
questions I had: Why would a suicide bomber need a passport? And why
was the passport not destroyed in the attack?
The second question can be resolved if we believe that the attacker
with the passport was shot. Problem solved. The first question can be
argued that the passport was used to cross borders legally. Fair
enough, but something still doesn't add up there. Assuming the
attacker used the passport to enter France, why would he need it for
the attack? Surely he would have just destroyed it before leaving to
meet the reaper. Which ever way you look at it, the passport
placement was intentional. Which leads us into our second theory.
Fake
passport intentionally taken by attacker
This one isn't too hard to believe. It makes sense that the presence
of a Syrian passport would be taken to the attack, in order to
encourage a racist backlash from western society. The government
violence that follows acts of terrorism are predictable enough that
the attackers themselves are aware of the consequences. The point is
that when western society reacts by pointing anger at a particular
country, it legitimizes any retaliation. Once a plan for retaliation
or invasion is executed, that plan in turn legitimizes the ISIS
cause. Civilians will be bombed and people will die, as with the US
invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan after 9/11, and consequently, the
ISIS recruitment will increase. It's easier to convince people to
fight for you when there is an external evil attacking their land.
Global media will inevitably provide evidence of this theory by
reacting with anger. The Daily Mail already published a controversial
cartoon reminiscent of Nazi propaganda (see below), and even when the
Calais migrant 'jungle' was ablaze in the wake of the Paris attack,
the same paper downplayed any reports of a far-right reactionary
attack and still managed to blame refugees. For the devout believers
of the Daily Mail will give this hegemony a working class edge. When
elections come around, this will be the key issue that elects the
next government.
(Top image: Daily Mail cartoon referring to the refugee crisis, showing refugee's walking alongside rats into the EU. Bottom image: Nazi propaganda cartoons likening Jews to rats.) Credit
The xenophobic and racist reaction hinges on one key piece of
misinformation: that all Muslims are the same. Pointing to and
vilifying Islam makes for a simple clear picture for the masses to
buy into, regardless of how far it is from the truth. It is likely
that the attack in Lebanon was played down for this reason, as
Muslims were the target of this attack. The story of Adel Termos, the
Muslim man who sacrificed himself by tackling a suicide bomber and
saving many lives, was hard to find in the daily press, as this would
clash with the false idea that Islam is a big evil monster intent on
taking over the world, as opposed to the reality that beliefs and
views held by followers of Islam are as divided as those between
Catholics and Protestants. Religion may be used as a tool for thought
control in war torn countries at present, by ignorance and
misinformation are major instruments in the western world.
Zionist
Israel has a part to play
Israel had a part to play in the attack. To start, there is no
evidence of this, and as far as I know this isn't being discussed (at
least outside neo-nazi circles) but there is a possible motive here.
With France taking actions to recognize the state of Palestine in a
two-state solution, and Spain issuing an arrest warrant for Netanyahu
and six of his officials, it is clear that key members of the EU are
looking at Israel.
So why would Israel help this horrific attack take place?
Distraction.
It's not like these kinds of attack never happen in Israel's neck of
the woods, quite the opposite, they happen everyday in the Gaza
strip. A worldwide catastrophe would take the attention off of the
Israel/Palestine conflict and the war crimes within, and potentially
start a war.
Just an idea that one.
World
War 3
Here's
one more theory floating around. Paris was targeted and the passport
was planted in order to start World War 3. With German Chancellor
Merkel welcoming Syrian refugees with open arms, she blazed a trail
the likes of which are few and far between, one of compassion
(seemingly so at least). By increasing the terror alert in France and
putting the blame on refugees, there is a chance that Merkel will be
demonized for allowing 'potential terrorists' through the borders. A
clash between France and Germany may divide Europe between left and
right once again, and remember there is profit in war, though I think
this result is highly unlikely.
So
those are a few theories to be aware of as more evidence comes to
light. The western world should show solidarity with the victims of
these attacks, whatever colour their skin may be. We must also
remember that the main goal of these attacks, whoever turns out to be
involved, is fear. The fear of the masses is in the palm of their
hands, but we must be strong and take an analytical and pragmatic
approach to the situation that has occurred. Question all the stories
you read, and question how the UK government can increase security
funding with a crippled economy, but cannot sufficiently sustain the
NHS, the privatization of which will take the back burner while this
crisis dominates the papers. My thoughts are with all the victims of
this tragedy, and with the sufferers of fear currently in Brussels.